In which the poet
attempts to create a poem by describing certain curious idiosyncratic features
of its work—boy is it work—such attempts being by nature rather hermetic,
rather unapproachable to the unfamiliar reader being in this case 99.9% of all
readers—even this sarcastic guess being somewhat overly generous—what percent
of the world of readers is a dozen?
The Daily Battle
the
daily battles routine overriding the thought of thoughts
you
pay you don’t earn, don’t deserve
horseshit you can’t explain
overriding
the routine and to feel through careful prayer
so much complaining just such an inevitable
horseshit course of mind
the
presence of the small chip in the brain called crux beyond
that clear
minute, whereby spit not spat who wants/does not
which
begins life so if so not living yet living not life so
the cycle spins open to provide a juice
what
want wants is to stray you all of, shedding cells and
as cud to chew the pain of privilege never
stops
clothes
and phones and crying in the bathroom in the kitchen
self that rends removed sphere from both pain and privilege
of
the restaurant and puking and having to get it all together and get
that newspaper demarcates me
out
there and eat and talk and that feeling named dread is real and
close as credit no refund or…purchase only
consequence, get
close
as consequence of purchase no refund only store credit get
and feeling that dread and talk and eat out
there that name is real
me
out of these terms so onerous that newspaper scares me demarcates
got restaurant puking and having to get it
all
both
privilege and pain as spheres removed from the self that reads
bathroom in the kitchen crying in the phone
and
never stops yet the pain of privilege as a cud to chew
cells shedding you all is to stray and wants
want what
provides
a juice that when the cycle spins to open for a
so life yet not living if so living so which
life begins
minute
does not want to be spat whereby it becomes clear that
brain beyond crux the small presence called
beyond
the
course of mind complaining is just so much horseshit so much
prayer through the routine overriding the
careful feel
horseshit
if you can’t explain you don’t deserve if you don’t earn you can’t pay
Breathes Weed
@ end they walk out the
door and go dif ways
heavy electric fog settles over the days
expectations generate
abstractions frame our
days
change thrown into the Styrofoam cup of time
a pity to note the
movement of Man and men in poverty
dire everpresent and deride yet no feather out of place
on this wing
and may all creatures
number themselves one and cousins of
Death—delineated
as seven minutes after the stopping of breath
alas, we must suffer no to orient reaction according to
scale of Narratorial ‘I’
grew accustomed to
certain nausea being drawn into the pattern of your
patron and a tyrant beyond
oil the water rises to greet
thee
and meets the fog the
sea breathes
Staring
Staring @ brick rough waiting hands ring to sell
and to say words work themselves if you let them allow
the you to emerge in disconnection and
a rough to disabuse and thought so tired
@ this moment when the queen of voices pause to clear
her tab and lick
her tit composed of abstract possible language therefore
milky thereby opened which being fallen causes tenderness or
tender laughter choking on her fluid which be spit on
the crown of the skull causes a wonderful, true
baldness accompanied by a lovely ringing tone all the
rest of days in sum not bad for having wanted not
a moment past to pull your hair out Robert Walser
Cost Benefits
Cost
Benefits
Project to pursue banal writing proved all too
successful. Finally something nobody wanted to read or hear or parse, though
fully valid conceptually—a proper proposition accompanying realization humm—a
project meant to show that one constant underlying writing is the reaction,
mainly of enjoyment, pleasure, engagement or the opposite—polar fury. No, the
project was meant to portray through negation the (un)necessity of these
qualities—a vast shimmery mass of ‘text’ if it can be called that. Full in its
being, just there, not needing anyone or anything—an anti-erection. The
contra-Viagra. Designed to quash all arousal. But—it being such a long project
how can we be sure there aren’t any interesting parts snuck in? Indeed, such
thoughts prompted more hardy of the reader-explorers to push forward—I mean,
has anyone ever read this thing all through? Impossible. Maybe around page 3,000
it starts to get good? Or glitches? No no no. The author—an it most likely—has
been preternaturally faithful to the precepts of the project—proving another common
constant: w/rigor comes success, relatively defined.
4, 2, 4, 1, 2: 13
too much
language
to be food yet fatten
Holy, vanity
we call on you save us from the lie
And the seed and lie
And cede
like sun
to night where Hussars ride nano-mares
to topple we
why
because
fat supply
new
will this broken
hold
two roles wildly
contradictory so
cannot be trusted
flawed flawd
flwad
like: hold smoke
and tv cum
so let there be
despair, Holy
We call you
stop
nobody knows
what
the FUCK
you’re talking about Jack
Nicholson
Microfiction
Microfiction
In
which the poet attempts to create a poem by describing certain curious
idiosyncratic features of its work—boy is it work—such attempts being by nature
rather hermetic, rather unapproachable to the unfamiliar reader being in this
case 99.9% of all readers—even this sarcastic guess being somewhat overly
generous—what percent of the world of readers is a dozen? Rather this attempt
to create a vocabulary will hopefully engender phrases of interest if not
quality thereby enacting a transaction, not of language but of focus—the
entirely hypothetical reader attempting not so much to learn about the poems,
but instead focusing on these new phrases of interest as starting points of a
new conversation or set of considerations, expanding out from the original
intent to unthought heights, spurred by the personal as objective spark
powering new thoughts, thoughts about the world that receive their color and
their content from the internal specificity of the listeners mind and
experience. Thus not only does the reader become co-creator of these new
projections, they are also minions, enacting a function, completing the work.
Dark, formal, comedic, pre-ordained, unprovoked—the work is formally lurching
and rather formless @ least on a grammatic or no on a sensible level--@ least
during the first composition and first read thru—these experiences being
analogous. Upon further reading and through obsessive editing, a shape and a
sense is found whereby the work expresses itself and then works to best embody
those expressions in an optimal form so that the first order of importance is
generation according to a principle which can be as simple and dumb as feeling.
Things are spotting, garbled, ‘wrong’, b/c this is often how life plays out in
experience, also b/c the writers knowledge of writing comes foremost through
doing and only secondly through engagement with a canon or a community. Not for
nothing did the writer spend first year post-college living in the woods.
Therefore much time is spent puzzling out a chain that most likely has already
occurred and is most likely discussed already somewhere else more clear. But this shall be as a strength unto
me. And so puzzling becomes a vaunted feature. Embraced, not downplayed.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)